<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ask HISTORY — History Q&#38;A</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/feed/rss2/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.history.com/news/ask-history</link>
	<description>Myths debunked, truths revealed and your most burning history questions answered.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 11:00:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>What was the first capital of the United States?</title>
		<link>http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/what-was-the-first-capital-of-the-united-states</link>
		<comments>http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/what-was-the-first-capital-of-the-united-states#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 11:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennie Cohen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ask HISTORY Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colonial America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[District of Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philadelphia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/?p=9727</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><iframe src="http://servicesaetn-a.akamaihd.net/pservice/embed-player/?siteId=hist&amp;tPid=11914820001&amp;height=412&amp;width=620" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" width="620" height="412"></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/what-was-the-first-capital-of-the-united-states/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What are the bog bodies?</title>
		<link>http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/what-are-the-bog-bodies</link>
		<comments>http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/what-are-the-bog-bodies#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 11:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennie Cohen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ancient History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Burials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Sacrifice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/?p=9716</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For centuries, archaeologists and other scholars have been trying to unravel the mystery behind the hundreds of bodies—the oldest dating back some 10,000 years—found buried in the wetlands of Northern Europe. Due to lack of oxygen and the anti-microbial properties of peat moss, many of the “bog bodies” found in Ireland, the United Kingdom, Germany, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For centuries, archaeologists and other scholars have been trying to unravel the mystery behind the hundreds of bodies—the oldest dating back some 10,000 years—found buried in the wetlands of Northern Europe. Due to lack of oxygen and the anti-microbial properties of peat moss, many of the “bog bodies” found in Ireland, the United Kingdom, Germany, the Netherlands and especially Denmark are startlingly well-preserved, with discernible facial features, fingerprints, hair, nails and other identifying traits. Most of them date to the Iron Age—the centuries before and after the birth of Christ—and many show signs of torture or other violence. Cremation was customary at that time, so bog burial must have been a special event. Yet Iron Age Europeans left no written records about their customs or rituals, and scholars have only been able to speculate about how and why the bog bodies ended up where they did.</p>
<p>Ireland&#8217;s Countess of Moira, an avid antiquarian, launched these speculations in 1783 by proposing that the bodies could belong to victims of Druid ceremonies. Others have used writings of the Roman historian Tacitus from the first century A.D. to support the theory that they were executed deserters. Less convincingly, researchers in Nazi Germany searched for evidence that the bog bodies were specimens of a proto-Germanic people from which the so-called &#8220;Nordic&#8221; race descended. Despite the range of hypotheses proposed, today’s archaeologists generally agree that most of the bog bodies seem to be evidence of the Iron Age ritual of human sacrifice. First proposed in the 1950s, this theory goes that the victims could have been offerings to pacify Nordic gods like Odin or Nerthus after a bad harvest or other misfortune. However, a team of forensic investigators in Denmark examined that country&#8217;s bog bodies in recent years and determined that some damage previously believed to be evidence of torture or other violence was in fact inflicted centuries after death. The only conclusion that seems certain is that despite centuries of study, the mystery of the bog bodies endures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/what-are-the-bog-bodies/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is Cinco de Mayo?</title>
		<link>http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/what-is-cinco-de-mayo</link>
		<comments>http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/what-is-cinco-de-mayo#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 11:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennie Cohen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ask HISTORY Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Holidays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/?p=9699</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[test 1]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><iframe src="http://servicesaetn-a.akamaihd.net/pservice/embed-player/?siteId=hist&amp;tPid=23484995572&amp;height=412&amp;width=620" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" width="620" height="412"></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/what-is-cinco-de-mayo/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Where did poker originate?</title>
		<link>http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/where-did-poker-originate</link>
		<comments>http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/where-did-poker-originate#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 11:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennie Cohen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ancient History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colonial America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Games]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/?p=9672</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The game we know as poker is believed to have ancient roots that go back nearly 1,000 years, crossing several continents and cultures. Some historians say poker&#8217;s origins can be traced to a domino-card game played by a 10th-century Chinese emperor; others claim it is a descendant of the Persian card game &#8220;As Nas,&#8221; which [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The game we know as poker is believed to have ancient roots that go back nearly 1,000 years, crossing several continents and cultures. Some historians say poker&#8217;s origins can be traced to a domino-card game played by a 10th-century Chinese emperor; others claim it is a descendant of the Persian card game &#8220;As Nas,&#8221; which dates back to the 16th century. Poker&#8217;s closest European predecessor was Poque, which caught on in France in the 17th century. Poque and its German equivalent, pochen, were both based on the 16th-century Spanish game primero, which featured three cards dealt to each player and bluffing (or betting high on poor cards) as a key part of the game. French colonists brought Poque to their settlements in North America, including New Orleans and the surrounding area, which became part of the United States thanks to the Louisiana Purchase of 1803. English-speaking settlers in the region Anglicized Poque to poker and adopted features of the modern game, including five cards for each player and (by 1834) a 52-card deck.</p>
<p>From there, poker spread up the Mississippi River and throughout the country, thanks in part to its popularity among crews of riverboats transporting goods via that great waterway. Soldiers in both the North and South played poker during the Civil War, and it became a staple of Wild West saloons in frontier settlements in the 1870s and 1880s. In 1871 the game was introduced to Europe after Queen Victoria heard the U.S. minister to Great Britain explaining the game to members of her court and asked him for the rules. More general acceptance of poker in Europe occurred several decades later, largely thanks to the influence of American soldiers during World War I. Over time, different games have dominated among poker players, including five-card draw, seven-card stud and—most recently—Texas Hold&#8217;em, which began its rise to dominance in the 1970s when it became the featured game in the World Series of Poker, the game&#8217;s leading annual competition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/where-did-poker-originate/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What happened to the Aztecs?</title>
		<link>http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/what-happened-to-the-aztecs</link>
		<comments>http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/what-happened-to-the-aztecs#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 11:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennie Cohen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ask HISTORY Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aztecs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/?p=9684</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><iframe src="http://servicesaetn-a.akamaihd.net/pservice/embed-player/?siteId=hist&amp;tPid=21369411646&amp;height=412&amp;width=620" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" width="620" height="412"></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/what-happened-to-the-aztecs/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why was Stonehenge built?</title>
		<link>http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/why-was-stonehenge-built</link>
		<comments>http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/why-was-stonehenge-built#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennie Cohen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[British History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stonehenge]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/?p=9656</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although it&#8217;s one of the world&#8217;s most famous monuments, the prehistoric stone circle known as Stonehenge remains shrouded in mystery. Built on Salisbury Plain in Wiltshire, England, Stonehenge was constructed in several stages between 3000 and 1500 B.C., spanning the Neolithic Period to the Bronze Age. Its massive scale suggests that Stonehenge was vitally important [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although it&#8217;s one of the world&#8217;s most famous monuments, the prehistoric stone circle known as Stonehenge remains shrouded in mystery. Built on Salisbury Plain in Wiltshire, England, Stonehenge was constructed in several stages between 3000 and 1500 B.C., spanning the Neolithic Period to the Bronze Age. Its massive scale suggests that Stonehenge was vitally important to the ancient peoples who built it, but the monument&#8217;s purpose has been the subject of widespread speculation for centuries. Theories run the gamut, casting Stonehenge as anything from an ancient healing center to an alien landing site. In the 17th and 18th centuries, many believed Stonehenge was a Druid temple, built by those ancient Celtic pagans as a center for their religious worship. Though more recent scholars have concluded that Stonehenge likely predated the Druids by some 2,000 years, modern-day Druidic societies still see it as a pilgrimage destination.</p>
<p>One enduring hypothesis for Stonehenge&#8217;s purpose comes from the initial observation, first made by 18th-century scholars, that the monument&#8217;s entrance faces the rising sun on the day of the summer solstice. For many, this orientation suggests that ancient astronomers may have used Stonehenge as a kind of solar calendar to track the movement of the sun and moon and mark the changing seasons. New excavations in recent years, however, have unearthed a different theory based on hundreds of human bones found at the site, dating across 1,000 years and showing signs of cremation before burial. The presence of these remains suggests that Stonehenge could have served as an ancient burial ground as well as a ceremonial complex and temple of the dead. In 2010 archaeologists discovered a second stone circle located just over a mile away from the more famous landmark. Dubbed &#8220;Bluestonehenge&#8221; for the 25 Welsh bluestones that originally made up the site, this secondary monument provides more evidence that Stonehenge could have been part of a huge memorial complex where high-ranking individuals took part in elaborate rituals and ceremonies honoring the dead. Yet as no written records exist, this theory—like all those about Stonehenge&#8217;s purpose—can only remain a matter of speculation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/why-was-stonehenge-built/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Did the founding fathers wear wigs?</title>
		<link>http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/did-the-founding-fathers-wear-wigs</link>
		<comments>http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/did-the-founding-fathers-wear-wigs#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 11:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennie Cohen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ask HISTORY Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colonial America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Founding Fathers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/?p=9638</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><iframe src="http://servicesaetn-a.akamaihd.net/pservice/embed-player/?siteId=hist&amp;tPid=14087235861&amp;height=412&amp;width=620" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" width="620" height="412"></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/did-the-founding-fathers-wear-wigs/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who invented baseball?</title>
		<link>http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/who-invented-baseball</link>
		<comments>http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/who-invented-baseball#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 11:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennie Cohen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Baseball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/?p=9625</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You may have heard that a young man named Abner Doubleday invented the game known as baseball in Cooperstown, New York, during the summer of 1839. Doubleday then went on to become a Civil War hero, while baseball became America&#8217;s beloved national pastime. Not only is that story untrue, it’s not even in the ballpark. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may have heard that a young man named Abner Doubleday invented the game known as baseball in Cooperstown, New York, during the summer of 1839. Doubleday then went on to become a Civil War hero, while baseball became America&#8217;s beloved national pastime. Not only is that story untrue, it’s not even in the ballpark. Doubleday was still at West Point in 1839, and he never claimed to have anything to do with baseball. In 1907, a special commission created by the sporting goods magnate and former major league player A.J. Spalding used flimsy evidence—namely the claims of one man, mining engineer Abner Graves—to come up with the Doubleday origin story. Cooperstown businessmen and major league officials would rely on the myth&#8217;s enduring power in the 1930s, when they established the National Baseball Hall of Fame and Museum in the village.</p>
<p>As it turns out, the real history of baseball is a little more complicated than the Doubleday legend. References to games resembling baseball in the United States date back to the 18th century. Its most direct ancestors appear to be two English games: rounders (a children&#8217;s game brought to New England by the earliest colonists) and cricket. By the time of the American Revolution, variations of such games were being played on schoolyards and college campuses across the country. They became even more popular in newly industrialized cities where men sought work in the mid-19th century. In September 1845, a group of New York City men founded the New York Knickerbocker Baseball Club. One of them—volunteer firefighter and bank clerk Alexander Joy Cartwright—would codify a new set of rules that would form the basis for modern baseball, calling for a diamond-shaped infield, foul lines and the three-strike rule. He also abolished the dangerous practice of tagging runners by throwing balls at them.</p>
<p>Cartwright’s changes made the burgeoning pastime faster-paced and more challenging while clearly differentiating it from older games like cricket. In 1846, the Knickerbockers played the first official game of baseball against a team of cricket players, beginning a new, uniquely American tradition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/who-invented-baseball/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Did Vikings really wear horned helmets?</title>
		<link>http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/did-vikings-really-wear-horned-helmets</link>
		<comments>http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/did-vikings-really-wear-horned-helmets#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 11:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennie Cohen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Vikings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/?p=9613</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Forget almost every Viking costume you’ve ever seen. Yes, the pugnacious Scandinavians probably sported headgear when they marched into battle, but there’s no reason to believe it was festooned with horns. In depictions dating from the Viking age—between the eighth and 11th centuries—warriors appear either bareheaded or clad in simple helmets likely made of either [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forget almost every Viking costume you’ve ever seen. Yes, the pugnacious Scandinavians probably sported headgear when they marched into battle, but there’s no reason to believe it was festooned with horns. In depictions dating from the Viking age—between the eighth and 11th centuries—warriors appear either bareheaded or clad in simple helmets likely made of either iron or leather. And despite years of searching, archaeologists have yet to uncover a Viking-era helmet embellished with horns. In fact, only one complete helmet that can definitively be called “Viking” has turned up. Discovered in 1943 on Gjermundbu farm in Norway, the 10th-century artifact has a rounded iron cap, a guard around the eyes and nose, and no horns to speak of.</p>
<p>The popular image of the strapping Viking in a horned helmet dates back to the 1800s, when Scandinavian artists like Sweden’s Gustav Malmström included the headgear in their portrayals of the raiders. When Wagner staged his “Der Ring des Nibelungen” opera cycle in the 1870s, costume designer Carl Emil Doepler created horned helmets for the Viking characters, and an enduring stereotype was born.</p>
<p>Malmström, Doepler and others may have been inspired by 19th-century discoveries of ancient horned helmets that later turned out to predate the Vikings. They may also have taken a cue from ancient Greek and Roman chroniclers, who described northern Europeans wearing helmets adorned with all manner of ornaments, including horns, wings and antlers. But not only did this headgear fall out of fashion at least a century before the Vikings appeared, it was likely only donned for ceremonial purposes by Norse and Germanic priests. After all, horns’ practicality in actual combat is dubious at best. Sure, they could help intimidate enemies and maybe even poke out a few eyes, but they would have been even more likely to get entangled in a tree branch or embedded in a shield.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/did-vikings-really-wear-horned-helmets/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Was St. Patrick Irish?</title>
		<link>http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/was-st-patrick-irish</link>
		<comments>http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/was-st-patrick-irish#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 11:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennie Cohen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ask HISTORY Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christianity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[St. Patrick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[St. Patrick's Day]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/?p=9582</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><iframe src="http://servicesaetn-a.akamaihd.net/pservice/embed-player/?siteId=hist&amp;tPid=16551491642&amp;height=412&amp;width=620" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" width="620" height="412"></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/was-st-patrick-irish/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Were they always called World War I and World War II?</title>
		<link>http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/were-they-always-called-world-war-i-and-world-war-ii</link>
		<comments>http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/were-they-always-called-world-war-i-and-world-war-ii#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 12:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennie Cohen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World War I]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World War II]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/?p=9567</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The short answer is no, though it’s hard to pinpoint precisely when the World War I and World War II—or First World War and Second World War—monikers arose. During World War I, of course, nobody knew that a second global conflict would follow closely on the heels of the first, so there was no need [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The short answer is no, though it’s hard to pinpoint precisely when the World War I and World War II—or First World War and Second World War—monikers arose. During World War I, of course, nobody knew that a second global conflict would follow closely on the heels of the first, so there was no need to distinguish it as the first of its kind. After initially referring to the “European War,” U.S. newspapers adopted “World War” once America entered the confrontation in 1917. On the other side of the Atlantic, meanwhile, Britons preferred “Great War” until the 1940s—with the notable exception of Winston Churchill, who reminisced about the “World War” in the 1927 volume of his memoir “The World Crisis.”</p>
<p>“World War II,” on the other hand, first appeared in print all the way back in February 1919, when a Manchester Guardian article used the term much in the way people today predict a hypothetical “World War III.” But it was Franklin D. Roosevelt who in 1941 would publicly label the conflict the “Second World War,” and his fellow Americans quickly followed suit. (In Britain, it remained simply “the War” until the late 1940s.) While Roosevelt may have helped popularize the name, it seems he wasn’t entirely satisfied with it. In 1942 he asked the public to propose alternate appellations, and over the next few weeks the War Department received 15,000 submissions ranging from “the War for Civilization” to “the War Against Enslavement.” Neither these nor Roosevelt’s own choice—“the Survival War”—had staying power. “World War II” and “Second World War” it was—and, as a result, “I” or “First” was appended to the clash that preceded it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/were-they-always-called-world-war-i-and-world-war-ii/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Where is Genghis Khan buried?</title>
		<link>http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/where-is-genghis-khan-buried</link>
		<comments>http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/where-is-genghis-khan-buried#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 12:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennie Cohen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Burials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Genghis Khan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Royalty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/?p=9428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The mystery began on August 18, 1227, when Mongol leader Genghis Khan died of unknown causes while leading a military campaign in China. According to legend, Khan’s successors killed anyone who witnessed his funeral procession on its way back to the Mongol capital of Karakorum. Some 800 soldiers are said to have massacred the 2,000 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The mystery began on August 18, 1227, when Mongol leader Genghis Khan died of unknown causes while leading a military campaign in China. According to legend, Khan’s successors killed anyone who witnessed his funeral procession on its way back to the Mongol capital of Karakorum. Some 800 soldiers are said to have massacred the 2,000 people who attended his funeral, before being summarily executed themselves. Khan’s corpse was then placed in an unmarked grave to ensure his rest would be undisturbed. Horses trampled all evidence of the burial, and some say a river was diverted to flow over the site. As a result of these extreme measures, the location of Khan’s tomb has remained unknown for almost 900 years.</p>
<p>Most experts believe Khan was buried somewhere near his birthplace in Khentii Aimag, northeastern Mongolia, and that his descendants may be buried there along with him—but they don’t have much more to go on than that. Researchers weren’t even allowed in the area until after the Soviet occupation of Mongolia ended in the 1990s. And in the decades since, various groups have been pressured to give up their searches due to protests from the Mongolian government and public that excavation would disturb the rest of their national hero.</p>
<p>Such opposition has not halted the hunt. In 2004 Japanese-Mongolian researchers discovered the remains of what they think is Khan’s palace complex on the grassy steppe of Khentii Province, 150 miles east of the Mongolian capital, Ulan Bator; they believe his tomb may be somewhere nearby. And since 2008, the Valley of the Khans Project has been using cutting-edge technology to search for Khan&#8217;s final resting place. The project has enlisted thousands of “citizen scientists” to comb through high-resolution satellite images of the region looking for possible clues, giving amateurs with a home computer and an Internet connection a rare chance to help solve one of history&#8217;s most enduring riddles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/where-is-genghis-khan-buried/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Did Shoeless Joe Jackson conspire to throw the 1919 World Series?</title>
		<link>http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/did-shoeless-joe-jackson-conspire-to-throw-the-1919-world-series</link>
		<comments>http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/did-shoeless-joe-jackson-conspire-to-throw-the-1919-world-series#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 12:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennie Cohen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Baseball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scandals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/?p=9417</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the third-highest career batting average in Major League Baseball history (.356), Joseph Jefferson “Shoeless Joe” Jackson would certainly be a shoo-in for the Hall of Fame—if it weren&#8217;t for the Black Sox Scandal. He and seven teammates on the Chicago White Sox were accused of conspiring with gamblers to throw the 1919 World Series [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the third-highest career batting average in Major League Baseball history (.356), Joseph Jefferson “Shoeless Joe” Jackson would certainly be a shoo-in for the Hall of Fame—if it weren&#8217;t for the Black Sox Scandal. He and seven teammates on the Chicago White Sox were accused of conspiring with gamblers to throw the 1919 World Series to the Cincinnati Reds. They were acquitted following a jury trial in 1921, but newly appointed baseball commissioner Judge Kenesaw Mountain Landis barred them for life from professional baseball.</p>
<p>Debate has raged ever since over the extent of Jackson’s participation in the scheme. He claimed his teammates gave his name to the gamblers even though he hadn’t agreed to participate, and the other players admitted that Jackson never attended meetings about the fix. Though Jackson signed a confession in 1920 stating that he was paid $5,000 (out of the $20,000 he was promised), he later asserted that a team lawyer manipulated him into signing a document he didn’t fully understand. (Jackson never learned to read or write.) He also said he tried to return the money and talk to White Sox owner Charles Comiskey about the plan both before and after the series, but was rebuffed.</p>
<p>And finally, there’s the matter of Jackson’s play on the field. During the 1919 championship, the slugger made no errors and racked up 12 hits, a World Series record that stood until 1964. His batting average for the series (.375) was the highest on either team. If Jackson did try to throw the championship, his supporters argue, he did a pretty poor job. In any event, after the 1921 ban Jackson played “outlaw” ball under an assumed name before retiring to his hometown of Greenville, South Carolina, where he eventually owned a liquor store. He made various efforts to be reinstated, all of which were denied, before his death in 1951.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/did-shoeless-joe-jackson-conspire-to-throw-the-1919-world-series/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who was responsible for the St. Valentine&#8217;s Day Massacre?</title>
		<link>http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/who-was-responsible-for-the-st-valentines-day-massacre</link>
		<comments>http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/who-was-responsible-for-the-st-valentines-day-massacre#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 12:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennie Cohen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1920s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mafia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prohibition]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/?p=9440</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perhaps the most famous unsolved crime in U.S. history took place on February 14, 1929, when police officers called to a garage on the North Side of Chicago found seven men lined up against a bare brick wall and shot to death, execution-style. The victims were associates of the Irish gangster George “Bugs” Moran, who [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps the most famous unsolved crime in U.S. history took place on February 14, 1929, when police officers called to a garage on the North Side of Chicago found seven men lined up against a bare brick wall and shot to death, execution-style. The victims were associates of the Irish gangster George “Bugs” Moran, who controlled much of the North Side&#8217;s illegal alcohol operations, along with most of its brothels and casinos. Moran—and many others—knew just who to blame: his gangland rival, Al “Scarface” Capone, the most notorious gangster in all of Prohibition-era America. Though Capone himself had an alibi (he was in Florida at the time of the murders), police suspected that his henchmen had carried out the killings on his orders. Capone undoubtedly had a strong motive for the crime: The massacre crippled Moran&#8217;s operations and allowed Capone to consolidate control over Chicago&#8217;s lucrative gambling, prostitution and bootlegging rackets.</p>
<p>The brutality of the St. Valentine&#8217;s Day Massacre shocked the American public—most of which assumed Capone was behind the killings—and shifted federal authorities into high gear in their campaign against organized crime, and especially against the man they called “Public Enemy Number One.” Due to lack of hard evidence, however, no one was ever brought to trial for the murders, and some have continued to cast doubt on whether Capone—who was put away for federal income tax evasion in 1931—was actually responsible. In his 2010 book “Get Capone,” Jonathan Eig builds the case that another notorious Chicago criminal, William White (known as “Three-Fingered Jack”), might have carried out the massacre to avenge the killing of his cousin by members of the Moran gang. Other Capone experts quickly moved to debunk this theory, however, pointing to the fact that White was imprisoned at the time and that the cousin&#8217;s murder was actually linked to another gang. Though the truth of what happened that Valentine&#8217;s Day might never be fully known, the massacre has rightfully gone down in history as the bloodiest example of the gangland violence that tore America&#8217;s cities apart during the Prohibition era.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/who-was-responsible-for-the-st-valentines-day-massacre/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is spontaneous human combustion real?</title>
		<link>http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/is-spontaneous-human-combustion-real</link>
		<comments>http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/is-spontaneous-human-combustion-real#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 12:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennie Cohen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supernatural]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/?p=9410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For several centuries, people have debated whether human beings can spontaneously combust, or burst into flames without being ignited by an external source. Though the first known accounts of spontaneous human combustion (SHC) date all the way back to 1641, the phenomenon gained wider exposure in the 19th century after popular author Charles Dickens used [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For several centuries, people have debated whether human beings can spontaneously combust, or burst into flames without being ignited by an external source. Though the first known accounts of spontaneous human combustion (SHC) date all the way back to 1641, the phenomenon gained wider exposure in the 19th century after popular author Charles Dickens used it to kill off one of the characters in his novel “Bleak House.” When critics accused Dickens of legitimizing something that didn&#8217;t exist, he pointed to research showing 30 historical cases. More recently, cases of SHC have been suspected when police and fire department officials have found burned corpses with unscathed furniture around them. For instance, an Irish coroner ruled that spontaneous combustion caused the 2010 death of 76-year-old Michael Faherty, whose badly burned body was discovered near a fireplace in a room with virtually no fire damage.</p>
<p>Because the human body is composed mostly of water and its only highly flammable properties are fat tissue and methane gas, the possibility of SHC being an actual phenomenon seems remote. Many scientists dismiss the theory, arguing that an undetected flame source such as a match or cigarette is the real culprit in suspected cases. Typically, deceased victims are found close to a fire source, and evidence suggests that many of them accidentally set themselves on fire while smoking or trying to light a flame.</p>
<p>On the other hand, believers point to the fact that the human body has to reach a temperature of roughly 3,000 degrees in order to be reduced to ashes. Unless SHC were a genuine factor, it seems impossible that furniture would not burn as well. Proposed causes of the supposed phenomenon include bacteria, static electricity, obesity, stress and—most consistently—excessive consumption of alcohol, but none have been substantiated by science so far. One recent hypothesis comes from British biologist Brian J. Ford, who in August 2012 described his experiments with combustion in the magazine New Scientist. According to Ford, a buildup of acetone in the body (which can result from alcoholism, diabetes or a specific kind of diet) can lead to spontaneous combustion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/is-spontaneous-human-combustion-real/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Did the Donner Party really resort to cannibalism?</title>
		<link>http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/did-the-donner-party-really-resort-to-cannibalism</link>
		<comments>http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/did-the-donner-party-really-resort-to-cannibalism#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 12:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennie Cohen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cannibalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disasters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donner Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/?p=9403</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Soon after rescuers reached surviving members of the Donner Party on the eastern flank of the Sierra Nevada in February 1847, the public was bombarded with grisly details about how the snowbound pioneers had resorted to cannibalism when their food supply ran out. Thanks to letters and journals kept by members of the Donner Party [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Soon after rescuers reached surviving members of the Donner Party on the eastern flank of the Sierra Nevada in February 1847, the public was bombarded with grisly details about how the snowbound pioneers had resorted to cannibalism when their food supply ran out. Thanks to letters and journals kept by members of the Donner Party and their rescuers, it has long been accepted that cannibalism occurred at the party&#8217;s main camp at Truckee Lake (later renamed Donner Lake) and among a smaller group that tried to escape the mountains to get help. But some descendants of the Donner family refuse to believe that any such thing took place, and insist that stories of cannibalism are exaggerated. And when recent excavations of a Donner campsite at nearby Alder Creek found no clear evidence of the taboo, initial news reports suggested we might have gotten the story wrong from the beginning. So what&#8217;s the truth?</p>
<p>The Alder Creek excavations, conducted in 2003 and 2004, turned up more than 16,000 bone fragments in all, including the remains of rodents, rabbits, deer, horses, oxen and cattle. They also found canine bones, supporting accounts by survivors that they ate their pet dogs. It&#8217;s clear that Donner Party members went to great lengths to avoid eating their own dead: The stranded migrants consumed a glue-like substance made from boiled animal hides, along with charred bones, twigs, leaves and bark. But despite the lack of human bones recovered from the Alder Creek site, researchers concluded that cannibalism may have occurred there in the days between the departure of the first relief party in late February and the last survivors’ abandonment of the camp in mid-March. While cannibalism may indeed be part of the Donner Party story, the Alder Creek excavations help reveal the more complicated truth behind their harrowing struggle to survive, and the desperate efforts they made to stave off such a gruesome solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/did-the-donner-party-really-resort-to-cannibalism/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who was the youngest first lady of the United States?</title>
		<link>http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/who-was-the-youngest-first-lady-of-the-united-states</link>
		<comments>http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/who-was-the-youngest-first-lady-of-the-united-states#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 12:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennie Cohen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[First Ladies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grover Cleveland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Presidents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/?p=9395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At the age of 31, Jackie Kennedy captivated the nation with her youth and beauty when her husband was elected president in 1960. But it might surprise you to learn that she is only the third-youngest first lady in American history. Who&#8217;s the youngest presidential wife ever? That title belongs to Frances Folsom Cleveland, who [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the age of 31, Jackie Kennedy captivated the nation with her youth and beauty when her husband was elected president in 1960. But it might surprise you to learn that she is only the third-youngest first lady in American history. Who&#8217;s the youngest presidential wife ever? That title belongs to Frances Folsom Cleveland, who was only 21 when she married President Grover Cleveland on June 2, 1886, in the Blue Room of the White House. A close friend and former law partner of Frances&#8217; father (who died in a carriage accident when she was 10), Cleveland invited Frances and her mother to the White House in 1885, right before the two women left on a grand tour of Europe. Though rumors flew that the president might marry Mrs. Folsom, he instead proposed to her daughter Frances by letter. They married when she returned, becoming the only president and first lady to wed in the executive mansion.</p>
<p>Such a young first lady fascinated the American public and press, who called her “Frankie” (a nickname she hated). Her hairstyle was widely copied and her face appeared on souvenir coins, while bustle skirts—a previously popular style—reportedly fell out of fashion after she stopped wearing them. In 1892, when voters reelected Cleveland to a second term after a four-year gap, Frances became the only first lady to return to the White House after leaving it. In September 1893 she gave birth to the second of their three daughters, the first child born to a sitting president. (Their oldest daughter, Ruth, supposedly inspired the Baby Ruth candy bar.) Grover Cleveland died in 1908, and in 1913 Frances became the first presidential widow to remarry. She died in 1947, after living longer after leaving the White House (51 years) than any other former first lady.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/who-was-the-youngest-first-lady-of-the-united-states/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What goes on at Area 51?</title>
		<link>http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/what-goes-on-at-area-51</link>
		<comments>http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/what-goes-on-at-area-51#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 12:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennie Cohen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Airplanes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aliens]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/?p=9390</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Located in the remote Nevada desert near the dry bed of Groom Lake, Area 51 may be the most famous military installation in the world that doesn&#8217;t officially exist. Though you can see the complex&#8217;s buildings in satellite images, it doesn&#8217;t appear on any public U.S. government maps. For decades, conspiracy theorists and UFOlogists have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Located in the remote Nevada desert near the dry bed of Groom Lake, Area 51 may be the most famous military installation in the world that doesn&#8217;t officially exist. Though you can see the complex&#8217;s buildings in satellite images, it doesn&#8217;t appear on any public U.S. government maps. For decades, conspiracy theorists and UFOlogists have speculated that the government uses Area 51 to experiment with extraterrestrials and their spacecrafts. Some have connected the site with the alleged government coverup of a 1947 incident in which an alien spacecraft supposedly crashed near Roswell, New Mexico; others have even claimed that the moon landing was staged right there in the Nevada desert. Skeptics may find all this hard to believe—but if it&#8217;s not true, then what really goes on at Area 51?</p>
<p>Over the years, the CIA, U.S. Air Force and aerospace company Lockheed Martin have all used Area 51 as a staging ground for test flights of experimental aircraft (a.k.a. “black aircraft”). According to documents declassified in 2007, in the 1950s and 1960s Area 51 was home to a top-secret Cold War-era program known as Oxcart, which aimed to develop a spy plane that would be undetectable in the air and could be used for information gathering missions behind the Iron Curtain. The result was the Archangel-12, or A-12, which could travel at speeds of more than 2,000 miles an hour and take clear pictures of objects on the ground from an altitude of 90,000 feet. Other well-known aircraft tested there include the A-12&#8242;s successor, the SR-71 Blackbird, as well as the F-117 Nighthawk stealth fighter. From the ground, such experimental aircraft traveling at Mach-3 speeds undoubtedly resembled some people’s idea of what alien spacecraft would look like, helping to explain why so many people reported UFO sightings in the skies above Nevada over the years. Such sightings—along with the secrecy surrounding the Groom Lake site—fueled the rumors swirling around Area 51, and helped create the air of mystery it retains today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/what-goes-on-at-area-51/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What killed the dinosaurs?</title>
		<link>http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/what-killed-the-dinosaurs</link>
		<comments>http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/what-killed-the-dinosaurs#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 12:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennie Cohen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ask HISTORY Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dinosaurs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/?p=9370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><iframe src="http://servicesaetn-a.akamaihd.net/pservice/embed-player/?siteId=hist&amp;tPid=7286851940&amp;height=412&amp;width=620" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" width="620" height="412"></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/what-killed-the-dinosaurs/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Did gladiators always fight to the death?</title>
		<link>http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/did-gladiators-always-fight-to-the-death</link>
		<comments>http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/did-gladiators-always-fight-to-the-death#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 12:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennie Cohen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ancient History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ancient Rome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gladiators]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/?p=9383</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hollywood portrays Roman gladiatorial contests as brutal, unruly duels that ended when one of the combatants killed the other. But in reality, gladiators didn’t always fight to the death. These ancient Roman athletes were highly trained professionals who made their living fighting, not dying. And since gladiators were expensive to prepare and maintain, killing off [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hollywood portrays Roman gladiatorial contests as brutal, unruly duels that ended when one of the combatants killed the other. But in reality, gladiators didn’t always fight to the death. These ancient Roman athletes were highly trained professionals who made their living fighting, not dying. And since gladiators were expensive to prepare and maintain, killing off mass numbers of them would have been a bad business decision for the lanistae who owned and trained them. Occasionally, sponsors would pay extra to stage a fight to the death, compensating the lanista for any lost gladiators. But more commonly, gladiatorial bouts simply had to have a decisive outcome, meaning that one of the contestants was wounded or his endurance gave out.</p>
<p>Successful gladiators could become major stars of the Roman world, and those who were slaves could sometimes be freed after winning a certain number of matches. Some surviving gladiators became trainers themselves after their fighting days were over. In 2007 scientists discovered an 1,800-year-old graveyard at the Roman city of Ephesus, Turkey, containing thousands of bones and tombstones identifying the remains as those of gladiators. Some of the skeletons showed evidence of healed wounds, suggesting that gladiators received medical treatment, and one seemed to belong to a retired fighter. Not surprisingly, other skeletons showed signs of violent deaths, including blows from weapons such as tridents, hammers and foot-long swords. (Hammers, though not used in the arena, were used to deliver offstage death blows to fighters who were too seriously injured to survive.) There is no question that gladiatorial combat was a dangerous business, but contrary to popular myth, it did not always end in death.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/did-gladiators-always-fight-to-the-death/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>