The enormous civilian death toll at Hiroshima—which Truman believed would be a “purely military” target—and the subsequent bombing of Nagasaki, which Wellerstein writes “almost certainly surprised” the president, prompted Truman to intervene. At an August 10 Cabinet meeting, he ordered that no additional atomic bombs be used without his express permission. “He said the thought of wiping out another 100,000 people was too horrible,” Secretary of Commerce Henry Wallace recalled. “He didn’t like the idea of killing, as he said, ‘all those kids.’”
“That’s when Truman explicitly puts himself into the chain of command,” Wellerstein says. “Truman realizes after Nagasaki he doesn’t have control—and suddenly desperately wants it.” His order established the requirement for explicit presidential authorization before further atomic attacks, marking a sharp break from his earlier hands-off approach. His response to the destruction caused by the two bombings also helped shape his belief that America’s nuclear program required civilian control.
Scientists Mobilize for Civilian Authority
Because the atomic bomb was unlike any previous military weapon, Truman believed it needed to be controlled differently as well. “The release of atomic energy constitutes a new force too revolutionary to consider in the framework of old ideas,” he said in a special message to Congress on October 3, 1945.
Truman asked Congress to establish the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) under civilian—not military—authority. The commission would inherit the Manhattan Project’s vast infrastructure, regulate nuclear technology and assume responsibility for the production and control of fissionable materials and atomic weapons.
The first legislation introduced into Congress fell short of the civilian control many envisioned. Drafted by two War Department lawyers, the May-Johnson Bill called for a nine-member commission that included four representatives from the armed forces and maintained significant military oversight and influence over atomic decisions. In specific situations, even the commission’s administrator could be a military appointee.
Manhattan Project scientists balked. Many viewed the bill as an extension of the wartime program and its culture of secrecy, censorship and strict military control—restrictions they had tolerated only as wartime necessities. They also worried that the government monopoly over nuclear materials and information, backed by penalties of prison time and fines of up to $100,000 for security violations, would stifle scientific innovation.
“The scientists don’t want the Manhattan Project to continue. They don’t think the military ran it well, and most of them loathe General Groves,” Wellerstein says. Scientists also feared that continued military dominance of the atomic program would signal to other nations that the technology was primarily an instrument of war, potentially sparking an international nuclear arms race.
To oppose the legislation, scientists organized through groups including the newly formed Federation of Atomic Scientists. They lobbied Congress and mobilized the American public to support the idea of civilian control, gaining the support of diverse organizations such as the League of Women Voters, the Congress of Industrial Organizations and the American Farm Bureau Federation.
The campaign worked. Truman withdrew his support for the May-Johnson bill, and work began on an alternative.