Conflicting Bear-Feeding Policies
Bears were obviously not responsible. Park visitors—who were being told not to feed animals at the very same time that official brochures invited them to ranger-organized feedings at garbage dumps—couldn’t be blamed for being confused. Posted signs sometimes prohibited “hand-feeding” as opposed to other kinds of feeding or specified that bears could be fed but only away from populated areas.
An article, “Inconsistent Bear Policies,” published in the March-April 1938 edition of Park Service Bulletin, commented that the NPS policy “is more in the nature of admonitions and advice against bear feeding” rather than a strictly enforced regulation. The NPS message was still not clear enough.
In the 1940s, the NPS tried more direct ways to educate the public about bears. Though some pamphlets and posters showed bears in a more threatening light, just as often they depicted cartoonish beasts. The NPS seemed to go out of its way to avoid asking visitors to take responsibility for protecting themselves and bears, though. In 1944, one sign attempted to educate through humor by pretending its intended audience was the bears themselves, saying that “visitors mean well” but that the bears have to exercise self-control over their own diets. Not surprisingly, this tactic did not greatly change visitor behavior or instill in humans any fear of bears.
The postwar return of the crowds brought a surge of bad behavior. Between 1946 and 1955, park visitation increased from nearly 22 million people to more than 50 million, all of them eager to encounter wildlife firsthand. The underfunded and understaffed parks were unable to effectively enforce rules so that, even with a firmer NPS edict to stop bear feeding, the harmful behavior persisted. People kept getting hurt and rangers kept having to kill bears.
In his 1946 annual report, Newton B. Drury, then director of the National Park Service, wrote, “Year after year, hundreds of visitors insist on taking chances by handing these genuinely wild animals tidbits of food, and every year has its record of serious and even occasional fatal injuries to those who indulge in the practice.”
Over the remainder of the decade and through the 1950s, NPS brochures and signs became less cute and more bluntly informative about the dangers of feeding wild animals, listing, for each park, the annual number of humans injured or killed due to the practice and the number of animals that had to be destroyed because of it. Official signs about feeding wildlife began to use the word “danger” instead of a slightly more circumspect “caution.”