During World War II, Nazi Germany and imperial Japan used strikingly different strategies to sustain their home fronts. Germany protected civilian living standards by extracting food, labor and wealth from conquered territories. Japan, with far fewer resources to exploit, demanded sacrifice from its own people through rationing, austerity and nationwide mobilization.
Both countries believed World War I had taught a hard lesson: Modern wars could be lost as easily on the home front as on the battlefield. In Germany, Adolf Hitler and Nazi leaders blamed the nation's defeat in part on domestic food shortages caused by Allied naval blockades. They also embraced the false “stab-in-the-back” myth, which held that Jews and socialists had betrayed the war effort from within.
“From the First World War, Hitler learned to never again be dependent on maritime trade to feed the people of Germany,” says Sheldon Garon, professor of modern Japanese history at Princeton University. “Japan doesn’t have that option. Everything they can’t grow themselves comes from the outside.”
Japan drew similar conclusions from World War I. After enduring food shortages and the nationwide “rice riots” of 1918, government leaders spent the next two decades trying to make the country more economically self-sufficient by expanding its empire across East Asia. Yet despite drawing similar lessons, the two Axis powers adopted sharply different approaches to sustaining civilian morale when another global conflict erupted two decades later.