The Legacy of the Ica Stones
Even after Uschuya’s confession, Cabrera and other believers continued to defend the legitimacy of the Ica stones. One theory is that Uschuya lied about forging the stones to stay out of prison. Under Peruvian law, it’s a serious crime to sell looted antiquities.
Uschuya fueled the conspiracy theories by giving conflicting reports to journalists, claiming that he didn’t make all the stones in Cabrera’s collection. Kelker says that, apart from the Ica stones, there’s no archaeological evidence of etched stonework produced by the ancient Nazca or Paracas cultures.
"In the Ica Valley of Peru, there are plenty of legitimate artifacts, but not on rocks,” Kelker says. “I'm talking about ceramics and things. It may be that some designs vaguely resemble the stones but not close enough that it's been identified as a distinctive style.”
In 1976, Cabrera published his book El Mensaje de las Piedras Grabadas de Ica (“The Message of the Engraved Rocks of Ica”), in which he claimed that various scientific labs around the world had verified the antiquity of the stones. Over the decades, there were numerous investigations, including requests to see the alleged lab results, but Cabrera always refused.
When a pair of journalists from the Skeptical Inquirer visited Cabrera’s museum in 2006, they examined the engraved rocks under magnification and concluded that the drawings were modern creations. If the etchings were ancient, they argued, a thin patina would have formed over time. No such patina was present.
As for Uschuya, journalists have since recorded him and other artisans reproducing replicas of the Ica stones in a matter of minutes using a dentist’s drill. To give the stones an aged appearance, they smeared the rocks with animal dung and baked them overnight in hot coals.