The Industrial Revolution Spawns a Fad Industry
The Industrial Revolution of the 1800s didn’t just transform production. It helped create a market for fads.
Fads were “far less common, perhaps rare or even nonexistent, during the preindustrial period,” leisure studies historian Jon Griffin Donlon writes in the 2009 book Encyclopedia of Recreation and Leisure in America. But industrialization made goods cheaper and faster to produce—and easier to promote and spread. At the same time, new communication technologies—from mass-circulation magazines to the telegraph and the telephone—helped accelerate that spread.
The word “fad” soon entered the English language. The Oxford English Dictionary calls its origins “unknown,” but cites examples from as far back as 1834 and 1867.
Fad or Fashion?
Just as Great Britain led the Industrial Revolution, it, along with France, long dominated the world of fads. That shifted after the First World War, when the U.S. emerged not only as a global power but as a cultural force, especially in fashion.
“From the early 17th century until World War I, Americans slavishly imitated fashions from abroad,” author and artist Douglas W. Gorsline wrote in his 1952 bookWhat People Wore: A Visual History of Dress From Ancient Times to Twentieth-Century America. By the 1920s, he added, “Paris, New York and Hollywood had become the three major style centers” with one thing in common: an emphasis on continuous change.
While fads and fashions often overlap, scholars distinguish between them. Fashions evolve over time, with one style replacing another, while fads tend to appear suddenly and fade just as quickly. The raccoon coats that were all the rage among 1920s college men might be considered a fad, but they were also a fashion in that later college students still wore coats of some kind. The pet rock fad of the 1970s, on the other hand, came out of nowhere—and went back there in short order.
Joel Best, professor emeritus of sociology and criminal justice at the University of Delaware and author of Flavor of the Month: Why Smart People Fall for Fads (2006), sums up a fad’s life cycle in three words: emerging, surging and purging. Fashions, on the other hand, can be visualized as a series of such curves, each overlapping the one before.
By the early 20th century, fads had become significant enough to study. In 1914, University of Southern California sociologist Emory S. Bogardus began tracking them by polling large numbers of students and teachers several times a year about what they considered the five biggest fads of the moment. Their lists included such soon-forgotten sensations as fake moles on women’s cheeks, feathers on men’s hats and the phrase “Ain’t we got fun?”
His findings, published a decade later, revealed that about 80 percent of the fads disappeared within a year, and fewer than 2 percent lasted three years. Those that endured—like men’s wristwatches and tortoise shell glasses—were probably not fads at all. And many innovations first dismissed as fads, from bicycles to television, ultimately proved to have staying power.